Home
Information Radio Network
News Commentaries
News Links
Affilliates

 



Senate Judiciary Committee Approves Bush's Pro-Life Court Nominees
By: Administrative Account | Source: LifeNews.com
April 22, 2005 6:04AM EST


by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
April 21
, 2005

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- The Senate Judiciary Committee approved two pro-life nominees selected by President George W. Bush for federal appeals courts. The votes move the nominees to the Senate floor, where pro-abortion Democrats are expected to filibuster them.

That sets up the showdown political observers have expected over changing the rules to prevent filibusters from being used to stop up or down votes on Bush's pro-life picks for federal courts.

The Senate Judiciary Committee approved the nominations of Texas Supreme Court judge Priscilla Owen and California Supreme Court judge Janice Rogers Brown for 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in the District of Columbia respectively.

The panel voted on 10-8 party line votes on both candidates with Republicans voting to approve their nominations and Democrats opposing the two women.

"In the last Congress, these highly qualified women were blocked by a partisan filibuster when Democrats refused to give them an up or down vote," Republican Leader Bill Frist said in a statement. "Soon, all 100 senators will have to decide if these highly qualified candidates will get a fair up or down vote on the Senate floor."

A leading pro-abortion Democrat says the duo will again be the victims of a filibuster.

"They deserved to be rejected before,'' said Sen. Charles Schumer of New York. "They deserve to be rejected again.''

Brown and Owen have drawn criticism from abortion advocates because of their pro-life positions.

In 1997, Brown issued a well-researched dissent in a case where the California Supreme Court overturned a pro-life law requiring abortion facilities to obtain parental consent before performing an abortion on a teenage girl.


She also dissented in a decision requiring Catholic Charities to pay for contraception coverage in employee health insurance plans. The decision concerns pro-life groups because it could lead to a requirement that abortion be covered as well.

Owen drew the ire of pro-abortion groups because she, as a member of the Texas Supreme Court, agreed with a majority of justices who upheld the state's parental notification law and denied abortions to several teenagers who sought a judicial bypass.

Brown and Owen had their nominations approved by the committee before but were one of more than a dozen court nominees subject to Democratic filibusters. President Bush renominated a slate of judges earlier this year.

Email this Article Printer Friendly Version

Related Articles
- Abortion Advocate Backs Down on Repealing Pro-Life Law
- Pro-Life Group Applauds Enforcement of Born-Alive Infants Protection Law
- Court Orders Release of Some Schiavo Probe Records
- U.S. House Backs Estate Tax Repeal; Senate May Push Compromise
- Bush's Immigration Plan Divides Republicans, Deadlocks Congress
- Oregon Supreme Court Upholds State Marriage Laws
- Pro-Life Group Troubled By Abortion Provider's Award Recipients
- 11 illegal aliens fail to appear for court date
- Federal Appeals Court Holds Hearing on Partial-Birth Abortion Lawsuit
- Pro-Life Senators Slammed for Alliance With 'Race for the Cure'
- Calling someone an immigrant can be a racial slur, British court rules
- Senate Approves ANWR Oil Drilling Measure
- Democrats vow to keep blocking ethics committee
- Senate confronts immigration
- Abortion Advocates Urge Grassroots to Back Senate Filibusters
- Senate rejects amnesty measure
- Negroponte Confirmed By Senate as First Intelligence Director
- Justice Ginsburg: Supreme Court Considers Foreign Laws, Not Just Constitution

Home| Search| News Archives| Submit News| Email Administrator| Login| Get Syndicated Content